On Monday, EU privacy regulators ruled that users of Meta’s platforms should no longer have to accept these sort of adverts, sources from Reuters and the Wall Street Journal reveal. The regulators declared that this kind of coerced consent falls foul of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the EU’s wide-reaching privacy law. This doesn’t mean it’s a done deal though. Ireland’s Data Protection Commission still needs to issue specific orders and decide on the fine in question. And, beyond this, Meta has the option to appeal the ruling. If this is upheld, it would mean that Meta — and, more broadly speaking, big tech companies that make profit through the advertising business model — would need user consent before using personal information and online activity to create tailored adverts. And here’s the tipping point: Meta would still have to offer its social networks to people, whether they consent to being targeted or not. This could not only spell severe financial hurdles for Meta and similar companies, but also unsettle the foundation many online businesses are built on. Think of the hit Meta suffered when Apple rolled out a privacy feature that stopped companies tracking users across apps. This is expected to cost Meta $10 billion in 2022 alone. This ruling by EU could hit the company even harder, but, of course, nothing is set in stone yet. Despite this, the EU’s ruling demonstrates that the 27-member bloc is ramping up the enforcement of GDPR. The regulation’s requirements for “obtaining explicit consent and providing individuals with control over their personal data” are designed to “enhance privacy in the EU,” Sam McCraw, founder and CEO of Design Hub, told TNW. Individuals should have “greater control over how their personal data is used,” he added, which is vital because of the sensitive nature of such information.
